An unnoted Justice Department court filing explain that a federal agent had the right to commandeer a woman ’s indistinguishability , set up a fake Facebook explanation using her details and even stake provocative photo of her found on a seized phone .
Buzzfeed reportsthat a Drug Enforcement Administration agentive role steal the identity of Sondra Arquiett , who then went by the name Sondra Prince , back in 2010 . The website explain how she find oneself out :
[ A ] friend ask about the pictures she was posting on her Facebook page . There she was , for anyone with an account to see — posing on the cowl of a BMW , legs spread , or , in another , tire out only lean attire . She was surprised ; she had n’t even set up a Facebook page .
Indeed , the DEA agent was using the account to communicate with suspected criminals . Why Sondra ? Well , admittedly , she had been arrested on suspiciousness of being part of a drug ring , and she wasultimately sentencedto probation . While she was awaiting test , an broker call in Timothy Sinnigen set up the faux account using photograph from her confiscated phone . It work : he communicate with at least one wanted fugitive .
But success is n’t , perhaps , the item — as Sondra well knows . The whole fiasco came to Christ Within , in fact , because she has been test tosueSinnigen , claim that her concealment has been violated .
unhappily for Sondra , the court rule that , while the Facebook pageboy has been retrace without her permission , it was “ for a legitimate constabulary enforcement use . ” Astatement explain :
“ suspect accommodate that Plaintiff did not give express permission for the usance of photograph contained on her telephone on an undercover Facebook page , but state the Plaintiff implicitly consented by granting approach to the data stored in her jail cell phone and by go for to the use of that data to aid in an on-going vicious probe [ sic ] . ”
Somehow , we suspect that was n’t quite the consent that Sondra assume she was giving . And that , perhaps , is the trouble : the pliant and unintelligible rule surrounding digital privacy and consent tolerate law enforcement officials to push their rightfield to the extreme . Sondra may not have been squeaky unclouded , but does that stand for she should n’t have digital privacy ? [ Buzzfeed ]
FacebookPrivacySocial spiritualist
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
news show from the futurity , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
